On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:38:40AM -0500, Jesse Meyer wrote:
> > However, the way I was taught it was that `virus' was already a plural
> > /did not have a plural in latin.
>
> As I said:
>
> > > Anyway, there are no recorded instances of a Latin plural of
> > > "virus", because its meaning back then was abstract and not
> > > something you could really pluralize.
My bad.
Note to self: Reading comprehension sucks in the wee hours of the
morning.
~ Jesse Meyer
--
Nifty linux app:
bitlbee : use your favorite IRC client to interface with aim, icq, msn
messenger and yim (www.lintux.cx/bitlbee.html)
==== icq: 34583382 msn: dasunt@hotmail.com yim: tsunad ====
Attachment:
pgp3Sf7oegkZl.pgp
Description: PGP signature