On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote: | | You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for | sure. Yeah right. Spammers don't subscribe to mailing lists like this one. | You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition | against CR. Oh. Your count is wrong. (too low.) I hate the idea of Challenge-Response. In almost every case, the recipient just won't see whatever I had to say (usually technical advice about something) because I file the challenges in the bit-bucket. I just ignored that whole thread (didn't even read it) because I already know that CR is pointless and essays explaining that fact abound on the www. | They were the main reason I chose the list for my provocations. Whatever. You just like a fight. If you didn't you wouldn't keep posting messages like this one that have no point other than to rile people. | I have their every post on file, So does lists.debian.org and google.com. Big deal. | and am preparing detailed responses to their twisted arguments. Maybe I should do some playing with your system, just for fun ... (and determine which other identies you enjoy boasting about) Then again, maybe I have better (productive) things to do with my time. Can you start at least trying to be civil now? -D -- For society, it's probably a good thing that engineers value function over appearance. For example, you wouldn't want engineers to build nuclear power plants that only _look_ like they would keep all the radiation inside. (Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle) http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/
Attachment:
pgprSCdDmZ0XB.pgp
Description: PGP signature