On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:52:40PM -0700, Alan Connor wrote:
|
| You have 3 spammers on the list, that I have been able to identify for
| sure.
Yeah right. Spammers don't subscribe to mailing lists like this one.
| You can figure it out: They are the ones that spearheaded the opposition
| against CR.
Oh. Your count is wrong. (too low.) I hate the idea of
Challenge-Response. In almost every case, the recipient just won't
see whatever I had to say (usually technical advice about something)
because I file the challenges in the bit-bucket. I just ignored that
whole thread (didn't even read it) because I already know that CR is
pointless and essays explaining that fact abound on the www.
| They were the main reason I chose the list for my provocations.
Whatever. You just like a fight. If you didn't you wouldn't keep
posting messages like this one that have no point other than to rile
people.
| I have their every post on file,
So does lists.debian.org and google.com. Big deal.
| and am preparing detailed responses to their twisted arguments.
Maybe I should do some playing with your system, just for fun ...
(and determine which other identies you enjoy boasting about)
Then again, maybe I have better (productive) things to do with my
time.
Can you start at least trying to be civil now?
-D
--
For society, it's probably a good thing that engineers value function
over appearance. For example, you wouldn't want engineers to build
nuclear power plants that only _look_ like they would keep all the
radiation inside.
(Scott Adams - The Dilbert principle)
http://dman13.dyndns.org/~dman/
Attachment:
pgprSCdDmZ0XB.pgp
Description: PGP signature