Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:19:50 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 873cghxxex.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030803220253.GF14726@ganymede> (Karsten M. Self's message of "Sun, 3 Aug 2003 23:02:53 +0100")
References: <20030731235730.GA1481@earthlink.net> <[🔎] 20030803041325.GD14726@ganymede> <[🔎] 8765lezxvg.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> <[🔎] 20030803220253.GF14726@ganymede>

At 2003-08-03T22:02:53Z, "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com> writes:

> Appreciated, Kirk.

Any time.  I still owe you favors for writing the "why I sign my email"
essay that I refer the occasional person to.
-- 
Kirk Strauser

Attachment: pgpHmtQUCDGgS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: why sign email
  - From: hashi@pooq.com

References:
- Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (was Re: Look at these update from M$ Corporation.)
  - From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
  - From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com>
- Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
  - From: "Karsten M. Self" <kmself@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: 2.6.test02 fails to compile...riscom8.o
Next by Date: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
Previous by thread: Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: why sign email
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread