Re: Challenge-response mail filters considered harmful (by spammers)
On Sun, 2003-08-03 at 18:38, Alan Shutko wrote:
> Alan Connor <alanconnor@earthlink.net> writes:
>
> > The sig would look like this:
> >
> > --
> > Please include this signature in any response to this mail. Thank You.
> >
> > 030303284857463625397654736322637485969437549596969685747
>
> That would be a bad implementation. First, that's not a valid
> signature delimiter. Second, if it were, many MUAs strip off
> signatures automatically in quoted replies.
For example: Evolution.
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA |
| |
| "I'm not a vegetarian because I love animals, I'm a vegetarian |
| because I hate vegetables!" |
| unknown |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: