Also sprach Alan Connor (Sun 03 Aug 02003 at 12:32:53PM -0700): > <snip /> > The above gibberish contributed by Karsten is typical of the reaction that > spammers give when asked what they think of CR programs. > > And it would make any slimy politician or sleazeball lawyer proud. > > Here's the basic dilemma: > > Most people want to be able to send anonymous mail to others,, but don't want > others to be able to send it to them. > > That's why there alleged 'spamfighting' programs never work. The spammers > just search for the loopholes that they KNOW exist because of the > essential hypocrisy of the alleged 'spamfighters'. > > *I* don't get any spam. Why do YOU? > > But then, a CR doesn't bother ME a bit. Been encountering a lot of them > lately. > > Don't complain when I have to log in to a website either, which is more of > a hassle than answering a CR, and I have to do it over and over and over.,,, Let me see if I've got this straight: [1] <A> uses a C-R system [2] <B> uses a C-R system [3] <A> sends an email to <B> [4] By sending that email, <A> whitelists <B> [5] <B>'s C-R intercepts <A>'s email [6] <B>'s C-R sends a challenge to <A> [7] <A>'s C-R passes <B>'s challenge onto <A> [8] <A> sends the password response to <B> [9] <B> accepts <A>'s password [10] <B> reads <A>'s original message [11] <B> responds to <A> from work, with his work email address [12] <A>'s C-R intercepts <B>'s email [13] <A>'s C-R does not recognize <B>'s work address [14] <A>'s C-R sends a challenge to <B> . . . Do I understand this correctly? P.S., Thank you, Alan, for finally following a thread . . . -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 877.596.8237 - Dare to fix things before they break . . . - Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . --
Attachment:
pgpG95liJGfvY.pgp
Description: PGP signature