Re: OT: why I don't want CCs
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:14:34PM -0400, MJM wrote:
> application. More PITA. So my thinking is that KDE, Gnome, and others like
> them are too much stuff too tightly integrated with too many test cases for
> even the OS community. I want to return to 1993 and reclaim some reliability
> and control in exchange for pretty uni-style GUIs that are akin to living in
If you are thinking about replacements for KDE and Gnome you may want to
check out: Fluxbox and/or Blackbox (fluxbox is based on blackbox).
http://fluxbox.sf.net
http://blackboxwm.sourceforge.net/
These are window managers, NOT full desktop environments with lots of
config tools. Seeing as I do
most of my configuration through a prompt anyway these are perfect for me.
I've used fluxbox for nearly a year now and really love it. I've never
tried blackbox but those who like it swear by it. I still use a number of
KDE tools (e.g. color picker and screen shot tool) but that's all I ever
wanted from KDE--just one or two things.
> As for Mutt having a vi editor, I thought that was pretty cool actually :-).
You can always change your editor to something else as well.
emma
--
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]
Reply to: