[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How "unstable" is unstable?



On 06 Jul 2003 21:07:42 -0400
Neal Lippman <nl@lippman.org> wrote:
> I'm wondering, from those running sid, just how "unstable" is it at the
> present time?
 
> The reason I am asking is that I would like to move on to KDE 3 and am
> feeling behind the times, still using KDE 2.1 in woody. I've been
> reluctant to track sid since I do need my workstation to be up and
> working pretty well, so I'd be interested in hearing from some who are
> using unstable regularly.

     I just dropped my server after a 151d uptime because I hadn't compiled in
two kernel options DHCPD needed.  It is an SMP machine w/dual 650 coppermines
in it.  I use it as my main server (web, ftp, mail, dns), NAT gateway for my
small network and workstation using both TightVNC and Exceed on an
underpowered laptop.  My only problem to date is Apache wigging out every now
and again.  As a workstation, rock solid.

-- 
         Steve C. Lamb         | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
       PGP Key: 8B6E99C5       | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
	                       |    -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpe1oZhktnvB.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: