Re: secure kernel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi. Why shouldn't I use kernel-image-2.4.18-1-386 insted of
kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4. It provides a better performence to me i586
computer ? kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4 works fine on my machine ;)
On Wednesday 11 of June 2003 03:24, Hubert Chan wrote:
> >>>>> "Derrick" == Derrick 'dman' Hudson <dman@dman13.dyndns.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Derrick> It isn't the kernel you want. You want
> Derrick> 'kernel-image-2.4.18-1-386' (as recommended by the DSA).
>
> Actually, the DSA does mention an updated kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4,
> which should have the appropriate patches.
>
> --
> Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
> PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
> Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
> Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+5vpymVxi/0Pw2OoRAjfwAKCLvLF67if5H+UVZHiKxfMnh2bWAwCfdfTA
UYy98lculp9qLh0k3xwTOBU=
=7aNF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: