Re: Suddenly, spell checking is gone from evo 1.2.4
On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 08:03, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> Am Son, 2003-06-08 um 10.36 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> > On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 02:21, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> > > Am Sam, 2003-06-07 um 23.35 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> > > > Here's my list of relevant packages:
> > > > ii evolution 1.2.4-1.1
> > > > ii gnome-spell 1.0.4-1
> > > > ii libaspell15 0.50.3-12
> > > > ii aspell 0.50.3-12
> > > > ii aspell-bin 0.50.3-12
> > > > ii aspell-en 0.51-0-3
> > >
> > > pspell?
> > >
> > > Ximian has a knowledgebase, there is an article that describes which
> > > programs are needed. Have a look there.
> >
> > Ok, I will. However, in Debian, evo is dependant upon gnome-spell,
> > and gnome-spell upon aspell*.
>
> Well, I use debian, I use evolution, I need pspell.
> To me happened the same as to you: "suddenly" spellchecking was gone and
> pspell brought it back.
>
> OK, I compiled it myself, but Ximian is with me:
>
> --------
> Required software:
> * aspell
> * pspell
> * gnome-spell
> * aspell dictionary
> --------
>
> http://support.ximian.com/cgi-bin/ximian.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_sid=IvPXPdLg&p_lva=&p_faqid=57&p_created=995654653&p_sp=cF9ncmlkc29ydD0mcF9yb3dfY250PTUmcF9zZWFyY2hfdGV4dD1hc3BlbGwmcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT00JnBfcHJvZF9sdmwxPTImcF9wcm9kX2x2bDI9fmFueX4mcF9jYXRfbHZsMT1_YW55fiZwX3NvcnRfYnk9ZGZsdCZwX3BhZ2U9MQ**&p_li=
Installing sarge libpspell4 (0.12.2-6) removed all sorts of things,
including sarge gnome-spell, aspell*, bluefish, gaim, gedit & logjam,
and unstable pan.
Upgrading to unstable gnome-spell was the only way to "cure"
a dependancy error, and now those packages are re-installed.
However, spell-checking is still missing from evolution...
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| Regarding war zones: "There's nothing sacrosanct about a |
| hotel with a bunch of journalists in it." |
| Marine Lt. Gen. Bernard E. Trainor (Retired) |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: