also sprach Jamin W. Collins <jcollins@asgardsrealm.net> [2003.06.05.1800 +0200]: > Well, TMK, "athlon" is indeed an invalid -march option with gcc-2.95. > After installing gcc-2.95 did you start with a completely fresh kernel > source tree, or simply attempt compiling in the previous tree again? > Based on the error, I'm guessing the later. Trying this right now... but no, the -march is still athlon. This is weird, because it's the vanilla kernel. Help? also sprach Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca> [2003.06.05.1829 +0200]: > This might be a dumb question, but if it wants 2.95.3, why are you > using 2.95.4-17? cause debian's got no 2.95.3 and i can hardly imagine that they get it wrong ;^> -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org> : :' : proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Keyserver problems? http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/keyserver.html Get my key here: http://madduck.net/me/gpg/publickey
Attachment:
pgpYwLDx8tNEQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature