[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt list-bugs question



On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 01:43:41PM +0100, Richard Kimber wrote:
> When I do and apt-get upgrade, list-bugs produces a short list of bugs
> and asks me if I want to proceed.  However, I'm not sure how to
> interpret the information it provides.  For example, take ssh.  Of one
> bug it says <done>, of the other it says <open>, yet the summary at
> the end says that ssh has two bugs.  Is this a bug in list-bugs, or
> does <done> not mean that the bug has been fixed?  The man page
> doesn't say what <done> means.

I suspect that apt-listbugs just lists all the non-archived bugs: bugs
are archived after 28 days of being closed with no activity. Offhand
this would strike me as suboptimal behaviour by apt-listbugs. (I haven't
really looked at it yet, though.)

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]



Reply to: