[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Will binaries for glibc2.2 work on the current unstable (with glibc2.3.x) ?



On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 05:24:31PM -0600, Harshwardhan Nagaonkar wrote:
> I have a ATI Radeon FireGL X1 128MB that I would like to get dri working 
> on. I know that we recently went to glibc2.3 in unstable (I'm not sure 
> about testing). 

Sid has had it for >6 months, sarge got it fairly recently.

> This is all in the cause of getting better framerates on 
> 'glxgears' (and graphics in particular). It currently gives me ~330fps. 
> My ego (and quake3demo) wants more! :)
> 
> Now, I checked on the dri website at dri.sourceforge.net and found that 
> since my card has the RV300 chip, it is not supported by dri yet. I then 
> went to get the proprietary drivers from ati.com and it says that the 
> drivers are compiled for glibc2.2 . Also I tried running that little 
> "check.sh" that they have and it told me the same thing that I already 
> knew (that I have glibc2.3).

I'm fairly sure that programs built against glibc 2.2 should be
guaranteed to work with glibc 3.3.  Barring bugs in gcc or glibc, I
guess.  If it doesn't, though, file a bug.  Not that it does *not* work
the other way round; programs built against glibc 2.3 generally don't
work on glibc 2.2 systems.

> I also run XFree86 4.3.0 from the penguinppc.org/~daniels repo. since I 
> could not get my card to work with XFree4.2 and upon reading on some 
> website, followed instructions to get it working with Xfree4.3.
> 
> If I installed the binary drivers (which are for glibc2.3 and 
                                                        2.2?

> Xfree4.2/4.1 only), then what are the chances that it will work on my 
> system with minimum breakage? Has anyone already done this?

It's worth a shot.  As I said above, the glibc thing should be fine.  I
don't know about XFree86, but I'd think they'd have that sort of
compatibility, too.

> I also read somewhere else that the Xfree4.2 binary driver works with 
> Xfree4.3, 

Cool.

> but this was on another distro (Mandrake or something, I can't 
> remember).

Generally, the distro doesn't matter with things like this.  Unless
Mandrake has done some maaaaajor hackage on X, it should be almost
identical to the version for Debian.  I think it highly unlikely they'd
change the interfaces and make themselves incompatible with everyone
else, for commercial reasons, if nothing else :)

> To sum up the info about my system:
> Debian Unstable (update as of 22 May 2003 except for some held back kde 
> packages)
> ATI FireGL X1 128mb
> Glibc2.3.1
> Xfree 4.3.0
> 
> Would it be any help at all to post my XF86config-4 file?

Just give it a go.  If it doesn't work, your XF86Config4 and
/var/log/XFree86.0.log files would certainly be most useful.

-- 
Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org>  |   mlspam@ertius.org   |   http://www.ertius.org/
GPG keys: 1024D/1E73B7CD, 4096R/3ABDE5EC     |      Do I look like I want a CC?
Words of the day:          Compsec Yukon Saddam Hussein rail gun Indigo colonel

Attachment: pgpRr7peLQ16W.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: