On Thu, May 22, 2003 at 11:33:24PM +0200, Mauro Darida wrote: > On Thursday 22 May 2003 03:36, Jeremy wrote: > > Tim Gunning wrote: > > >the compile went fine tho, so I think it must be something related to > > >gcc-3.3 or at least something that it calls during the compiling as 2.95 > > > had no errors at all. > > > > > >hmm - confused. > > > I to am confused. > Hey, guys, do you read this list? I remember someone said gcc2.95 is the > RECOMMENDED one for kernel compilation. Hope this helps... Indeed. However, 3.2 should also work for newer kernels (as in 2.4.20, and 2.5); if it doesn't it's a bug in gcc or a bug in the kernel itself. Also, gcc 3.2.3 is the default C compiler, which will be used unless you explicitly tell it to use something else. -- Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org> | mlspam@ertius.org | http://www.ertius.org/ GPG keys: 1024D/1E73B7CD, 4096R/3ABDE5EC | Do I look like I want a CC? Words of the day: S Key S Key Reno MP5K-SD Skipjack S Box Aldergrove enforcers
Attachment:
pgp7NwjdEf9VP.pgp
Description: PGP signature