[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: M$ licenses Unix



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:22:40AM -0500, John Hasler waxed eloquent and said:
> Carl Fink writes:
> > Mockery aside, as far as I know the GPL has never been tested in court.
> 
> Neither have most other licenses, including most proprietary ones.  The
> fact that the GPL has never been "tested in court" despite having been
> widely used for a long time implies that many lawyers have considered
> trying to break it and concluded that they probably would fail.  Seems to
> me that this unspoken consensus is a strong endorsement of the
> enforceability of the GPL by a substantial body of copyright experts.

This piece on enforcing the GPL may cast some light:

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/enforcing-gpl.html

Sometime back when I had occasion to have an email exchange with Bradley Kuhn, 
the executive director of the FSF, he said though no case has come to court, 
several have been settled before they came to that stage.

Sam
- -- 
Sam Varghese
http://www.gnubies.com
Experiences are savings which a miser puts aside. Wisdom is an inheritance which
a wastrel cannot exhaust.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+y/FWZyXhknb+33gRArRmAJwI5YUhCUy+K6lWJiGCHNMifPat2ACgjCh8
sNDBxceTD2KYIsgT/yAiMCk=
=XUdM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: