On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 00:39, Paul Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 08:10:48PM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote: > > SCO is also claiming that commercial Linux distributions have done a > > similar thing. No names named but they are hinting at SuSE and Red Hat. > > > > Additionally, today one official claimed that the generic Linux kernel > > has Unix code as well. > > Judging by the wide variation and descrepancies between accounts from > SCO, I'd say it's a pretty good case of the left hand not knowing what > the right buttock is doing. I'd still like to know which story is the > one they meant. > > - -- > .''`. Baloo Ursidae <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org> > : :' : proud Debian admin and user > `. `'` > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+xb0fJ5vLSqVpK2kRAvV9AKCsJ9FiJRiPJU+WPvJC+jVqrSCAhgCeK6jj > rIgbZwDwMJWcCyO6f3tkuHs= > =YFwQ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Y'know, I wonder if there might be room for someone to sue SCO for libel in amongst its claims about Linux development, and seek as damages ownership to the Unix source, which they would then put under a free license - BSD, maybe, GPL preferably. -- Mark L. Kahnt, FLMI/M, ALHC, HIA, AIAA, ACS, MHP ML Kahnt New Markets Consulting Tel: (613) 531-8684 / (613) 539-0935 Email: kahnt@hosehead.dyndns.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part