Re: apt-get trouble issues
On Thu, 2003-05-08 at 12:55, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> On 08/05/03 Paul Johnson did speaketh:
>
> > Looks like what eventually happens when you're running stable but are
> > pinning packages from testing or unstable. If this is the case,
> > either move to testing or unstable or reinstall stable and *don't pin
> > with stable at all*. Use backports instead, look at apt-get.org for
> > backports.
>
> Can you backport manually? ie. with rpms you can take the src rpm
> and build it on an older release. How would that be done with a .deb
> source file?
Add the deb & deb-src for unstable to sources.list, then
# apt-get update
Next,
# export CC=gcc-3.2
# export CFLAGS='-Wall -O2 -march=pentiumpro -mcpu=pentiumpro,'
# export CXX=g++-3.2
#
# pnam=gqview
# pver='=1.0.2-1'
#
# apt-get source ${pnam}${pver}
# apt-get --compile source ${pnam}${pver}
You don't need to do the "apt-get source ${pnam}${pver}", but I
like to separate the download and compile phases.
--
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| The purpose of the military isn't to pay your college tuition |
| or give you a little extra income; it's to "kill people and |
| break things". Surprisingly, not everyone understands that. |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: