[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GFDL Freeness Question

 --- "Michael D. Crawford" <crawford@goingware.com> escribió: > I have some
articles on the general topic of software quality at:
> http://linuxquality.sunsite.dk/articles/
> They are all under the GNU Free Documentation License, version 1.1.
> I would like these articles to be included in Linux distributions.  But in
> light 
> of the recent controversy over the non-freeness of GFDL docs with invariant 
> sections, I would like your opinion on whether the way I apply the GFDL would
> make Debian consider them non-free enough to refuse consideration.  (This is 
> quite a different question from whether Debian would consider the articles
> worth 
> including because of their content.)
> I don't have any invariant sections in any of them, but each of them
> specifies a 
> brief back cover text:
> "This contains material from the Linux Quality Database at 
> http://linuxquality.sunsite.dk";.
> Is that a problem?
> Also, while I have your attention, I would also like to say that I would
> welcome 
> any translations of these articles to other languages.  The Open Source 
> Development Lab has already translated the two kernel testing articles to
> Japanese.
> Thanks for your help.
> Mike
> -- 
Is there another license that also suits your needs and meets the Debian
requirement?  If so, consider releasing undere a dual license.  From what I
have heard that has worked out in the past.  Just an idea.


Yahoo! Messenger - Nueva versión GRATIS
Super Webcam, voz, caritas animadas, y más...

Reply to: