Re: Confused state of my system
- To: brownh@hartford-hwp.com
- Cc: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Confused state of my system
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Date: 01 May 2003 01:55:30 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 1051772130.1025.51.camel@haggis>
- In-reply-to: <200304301626.h3UGQcBd019469@hartford-hwp.com>
- References: <20030423040753.GA18546@mindspring.com> <39679.10.10.10.7.1051142497.squirrel@webmail.linuxpowered.net> <20030423022618.GB1419@mindspring.com> <20030424120959.69d8bc84.ronin2@bellatlantic.net> <1051704845.17628.173.camel@haggis> <200304301626.h3UGQcBd019469@hartford-hwp.com>
On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 11:26, Haines Brown wrote:
> > One of my systems is console-only and it's happily functional.
>
> Yes, I sometimes work by logging into the console, and it really works
> out fine.
>
> But I'd like to recall the question. I've heard that people have run X
> without any desktop manager (no gnome, KDE, ximian, etc.) and relied
Note that Ximian *is* Gnome made easy to install and upgrade. Note that
Debian makes it just as easy to upgrade Gnome.
> instead on a window manager and creating panels on which some useful
> applets are placed, such as a desktop switcher, window list, clock,
> etc.
>
> I'm migrating from RH8.0 to Debian stable, and so wonder about the
> potential for doing this under Debian. Is a desktop manager really
> necessary? Can one build a panel without it and run a window manager?
> If so, what are the preferred applications?
The window manager Xfce4 allows you to have a configurable panel.
--
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| An ad currently being run by the NEA (the US's biggest |
| public school TEACHERS UNION) asks a teenager if he can |
| find sodium and *chloride* in the periodic table of the |
| elements. |
| And they wonder why people think public schools suck... |
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: