Re: nano breaks my dpkg
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:39:11 +0200
Roman Joost <romanjoost@gmx.de> wrote:
>
> Unpacking replacement nano ...
> update-menus: relocation error: update-menus: symbol
> _ZNSt9basic_iosIcSt11char_traitsIcEE4initEPSt15basic_streambufIcS1_E,
> version GLIBCPP_3.2 not defined in file libstdc++.so.5 with link time
> reference dpkg: warning - old post-removal script returned error exit
> status 127 dpkg - trying script from the new package instead ...
> update-menus: relocation error: update-menus: symbol
> _ZNSt9basic_iosIcSt11char_traitsIcEE4initEPSt15basic_streambufIcS1_E,
> version GLIBCPP_3.2 not defined in file libstdc++.so.5 with link time
> reference dpkg: error processing nano_1.0.6-2_i386.deb (--install):
> subprocess new post-removal script returned error exit status 127
> update-menus: relocation error: update-menus: symbol
> _ZNSt9basic_iosIcSt11char_traitsIcEE4initEPSt15basic_streambufIcS1_E,
> version GLIBCPP_3.2 not defined in file libstdc++.so.5 with link time
> reference dpkg: error while cleaning up:
> subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> nano_1.0.6-2_i386.deb
> >>>
>
> Maybe i should file a bug against nano?
it's not a bug with nano, it's a bug with libstdc++5. note the flood
of grave functionality bugs filed against it (or against other packages
and moved to libstdc++5) in the last 24.
-c
--
Chris Metzler cmetzler@speakeasy.snip-me.net
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
Reply to: