Re: Switched from ext2 to ext3...no fsck needed after crash?

[Pigeon <jah.pigeon@ukonline.co.uk>]

On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 08:13:12PM +0200, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
> Well, I read 2 reactions now and I see there's still an fsck needed, but I
> mean: in the ext2 fs you sometime have to do a forced check manually, so you
> have to type a command. Not that problem, but i'm talking about an headless,
> handless and footless box, wich is controlled remotely. When the system
> doesn't boot, I can't login.
> 
> When there's a crash...do I still have to type a command? If yes --> is
> there a filesystem where I don't have to type a command?

I use ext3 on my headless box for exactly this reason - if something goes
wrong, I just hit the reset button, and it's back in action. No need to type
anything.

Pigeon