Re: reportbug .. am I doing it right ?
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 12:36:27AM +0100, Dave Selby wrote:
> >From firstname.lastname@example.org Fri Apr 18 09:22:11 2003
> Return-Path: <office@debian>
> Received: from debian ([184.108.40.206]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com
> (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP
> id <20030418082435.LXVR2283.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@debian>
> for <email@example.com>; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:24:35 +0100
> Received: from office by debian with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
> id 196R8N-0000Fk-00; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:22:11 +0100
> From: Dave Selby <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <email@example.com>
> Subject: general: kworldclock process multiplies
> X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
> Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:22:11 +0100
> Reply-To: Dave Selby <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Message-Id: <E196R8N-0000Fk-00@debian>
> Sender: <office@debian>
> Status: RO
> X-Status: O
You should check your MTA's logs to see why it didn't deliver it to
email@example.com (and it didn't, judging from the bug tracking
system's own logs).
> Package: general
> Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-18
Looks like you answered some of reportbug's questions wrongly, too ...
> Have I done everything correctly, is there anything I can do to see if
> my bug has been registerd ?
When the bug is correctly filed, you'll get an acknowledgement from
debbugs and it will appear on the web interface within fifteen minutes
or so. It looks like your MTA is misconfigured somehow.
Colin Watson [firstname.lastname@example.org]