Re: 2.5.67 Linux Kernel Support
On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 23:28, Hell.Surfers@cwctv.net wrote:
> my god you are rude, what did he do to deserve it.
For once I agree... it's one thing to ask someone to change it, but do
you *really* need that 14k right at this moment?
Jon
>
> DM
>
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:00:39 +0100 "Antony Gelberg" <ag@antgel.co.uk> wrote:
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> From: Antony Gelberg <ag@antgel.co.uk>
> To: Brendan Hukill <bhukill@nsllc.com>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: 2.5.67 Linux Kernel Support
> Date: 21 Apr 2003 23:00:39 +0100
>
> ---- Original Message ----
> From: Brendan Hukill
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Sent: Monday, April 21, 2003 10:26 PM
> Subject: 2.5.67 Linux Kernel Support
>
> > Hello,
> > I'm trying to install a 2.5+ kernel that is a part of a package which
> > includes the basic utilities. I am having trouble, as I am not sure
> > where to find such a package, and haven't been able to install one
> > onto a Linux O/S once I have found such a package. Can anyone help
> > me identify such a package, and also provide some sort of
> > installation procedure description?
> >
>
> No, but here's some tips for you. Turn off your html email, wrap your lines
> properly, and don't have a binary file in your signature. Normally I'd let
> someone else tell you, but I really resent 14k of my hard disk being taken
> up by your four line post.
>
> A
>
>
Reply to: