Matt Price <matt.price@utoronto.ca> writes: > hi folks, > > I'm thinking of switching from woody to sarge, or at least of adding a > sarge partition to my system. Has the 'gcc 3.2 logjam' broken up > enough to make it worthwhile to move over to sarge? That is, have big > important packages like gnome and kde been compiled with gcc .32, or > would I have to use unstable packages anyway (or the woody backports, > which I'm currently running). I'm running this > on an i386, which I assume is where things have moved furthest ahead > at this point. I strongly suggest not running testing until security updates are regularly available for it (ie. when it's close to release), especially since a lot of stuff still isn't percolating into testing. -- I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
Attachment:
pgpMc9lt4isXI.pgp
Description: PGP signature