Re: Webmin revisited

To: Glenn English <ghe@slsware.com>
Cc: debian users <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Webmin revisited
From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:23:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.53.0303281422430.16584@samadhi.braincells.com>
Reply-to: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1048871615.9065.15.camel@optiplex.slsware.loc>
References: <[🔎] 200303281330.37531.mark@kenge.com> <[🔎] 00dc01c2f53f$6dad64a0$6800817d@guilherme> <[🔎] 1048871615.9065.15.camel@optiplex.slsware.loc>

On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, Glenn English wrote:

> Another possibility: it's http, not https
>

unless the OP specifically changed that, it's not likely.

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar@debian.org>
La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/

Reply to:

References:
- Webmin revisited
  - From: Mark Annandale <mark@kenge.com>
- Re: Webmin revisited
  - From: "GBV" <guilherme@plannercorretora.com.br>
- Re: Webmin revisited
  - From: Glenn English <ghe@slsware.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Linux Sucketh not.
Next by Date: Re: synaptic issues...
Previous by thread: Re: Webmin revisited
Next by thread: Re: Webmin revisited
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread