Jeff Hahn <jeffh@gryphongardens.com> writes: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2003, Jamin W. Collins wrote: > >> Not so. "exim" is a base package. That doesn't mean that "exim4" would >> have to be a base package. It would just be another _optional_ package. >> > > Why isn't there just a exim4 package that provides "mail-transport-agent", > so that it could be used like any other alternative MTA??? > > Exim 4 has been in release almost a year. The lack of an "official" exim > 4 package (even in testing or unstable) prevents me from converting a > number of servers to debian. > > The most important questions.. Who should we be contacting about this? debian-devel is the mailing for general discussion of Debian development. > Where is the exim4 debate actually being discussed? The packaging of exim4 was discussed on -devel a few months ago, IIRC. I believe there are a small group of people working on it. > Who are the powers that be for this package? It looks like Andreas Metzler <ametzler@debian.org> is the primary maintainer. > What can I do to help the release??? Testing the exim4 debs in experimental and providing feedback to the maintainer(s) is probably the best way to help. -- I had no feelings about it. It was aloof and licked itself too much. Like my cat Mr. Trotsky.
Attachment:
pgpOdW7IegeFa.pgp
Description: PGP signature