[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Convincing someone to switch to Linux



On Monday 17 March 2003 06:23, Pigeon wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 03:05:57AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 10:29:42AM +1200, cr wrote:
> > > Agreed, but unfortunately there's all this spurious 'compatible' crap.
> > > Nobody was ever scared off buying a GM car because it wasn't
> > > 'Ford-compatible'.
> >
> > Really?  So that's why you see so many government issue vehicles that
> > aren't a Ford Crown Victoria or a Chevrolet Impala, or if it's been on
> > the road for a while, a Fordrolet Crown Impala.  There's not a whole
> > lot that can't be exchanged between those two on most model years.
>
> Well, the analogy works better wrt British Fords and GMs. Over here,
> one can proverbially assemble any set of Ford running gear into any
> Ford bodyshell. So you can take the guts out of your 1300 Escort and
> fit a Capri V6 and the overdrive gearbox out of a Transit van, and it
> all just bolts together. You can play similar games within the
> British/Vauxhall and German/Opel GM lines. But you can't put GM bits
> in a Ford, or vide versa.
>
> But as far as most drivers are concerned, Fords and GMs are
> compatible. The steering wheel, pedals etc are all in the same
> relative positions and work the same way. If you were to make a car
> with even slightly different controls - like a different gearshift
> pattern - nobody would buy it.
>
> Pigeon

Well, to take the analogy back to Linux - vs - Windoze -   all word 
processors work pretty much the same.   All spreadsheets work pretty much the 
same.   The difference between M$Word  and AbiWord, or  Excel and Gnumeric, 
is no greater than than the difference between Win95 and W2K versions of 
M$Word / Excel.   Just like hopping out of an Escort into a Vauxhall.

But Windoze users won't believe that.   They imagine anything but the M$ 
crudware they're accustomed to will be 'too difficult'.   

cr



Reply to: