Re: KDE vs. Gnome
Why limit yourself to just KDE and Gnome?
What about blackbox? enlightenment, fvwm, cde, window maker, icewm,
sawfish, afterstep, etc
Lots of little benefits here or there.
Personally I like KDE. It has more of a flashy interface. It really
doesn't matter.
The others aren't obsolete. They just have different values.
Each brings it's own unique flavor.
Chris
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 09:29, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> Some thoughts... (gnome2, Kde3)
> I myself use gnome2
>
> KDE: good
> -Better integration
> -Good looking
> -Konqueror inegration
> -Easy to use
> -Consistent naming
>
> KDE: bad
> -Arts
> -Bad support in Konqueror
> -DisKusting names
>
> Gnome:good
> -Easier to choose between apps (as in easier not to use Konq. for example)
> -Nautilus2
> -Nice applets & panels
> -Gdm2 looks good
> -Inconsistent naming (as in freedom of naming)
>
> Gnome:bad
> -Bad consistency in menus, settings etc.
> -WM and DE not integrated
> -Inconsistent naming (gtk-something, gnome-something, justsomething...
> never know what uses GTK)
>
> /johan
>
> GBV wrote:
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I prefer KDE, Gnome seens obsolete, and using gtk lib i´m able to use Gnome
> >appz on KDE with no problems at all,
> >
> >My objective with this message is to gather advantages and disvantages of
> >this two great softwares..
> >
> >Post your user and developer experience...
> >
> >thks...
> >
> >Guilherme Viebig
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Johan Ehnberg
> johan@ehnberg.net
> "Windows? No... I don't think so."
>
--
"Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by
subduing the freeness of speech." - Benjamin Franklin
Reply to: