Re: eep, gcc update no likey!
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 07:39:50AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 18:48, John Hasler wrote:
> > iain writes:
> > > ...libgcj3-dev and libstdc++5-dev both depend on LIBC_DEV(yes, with
> > > caps)...
> Could he be using an environment variable and forgot to put a $ in front
> of it?
No, it was an m4 variable in the file which generates gcc-3.2's control
file which was accidentally only defined for some architectures. I don't
think the maintainer will have much trouble fixing it now that it's been
Colin Watson [email@example.com]