Re: kept back packages because of libfam0c102
Francois Chenais wrote:
I have many kept back packages because there upgrade needs libfam0c102 to be installed implying e17 efsd libfam0 to be removed !!!
But I don't want removing e17 !:-|
Must I have to do this ??
e17 and efsd aren't in the main archives, where are you getting them
from? They need to make the gcc-3.2 transition. You might want to let
whoever mantains the archive for e17 and efsd aware of this, though I
would be incredulous if they weren't already cognizant of this. If it
is a 'stable' archive than they probably have no plans to make the
transition and you will have to look for another archive. Of course,
there is no reason that you *have* to upgrade, your current software
works, doesn't it?