[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ICQ behind router/firewall



On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:17:28PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 13:34, Scruloose wrote:

> --snip--
> > Needless to say, I'm using GnomeICU, 'cause it's limping along better than
> > the competition.  But how do I fix this?  Is there some port I need to
> > forward for the "so-and-so is online" packets to get in?  Is there a client
> > for Linux that's as smart as the windo~1 ones (to work behind a firewall
> > without port forwarding)?
> 
> Assuming that your firewall closes off whatever port it is that ICQ uses
> (5190 if memory serves... though it usually doesn't. ;), the only way
> that I could see Trillian working properly would be if it switched to
> some port that it knew would be open (like 80 for example) but that
> would be very very odd. (And very difficult to implement from the server
> side I'd think.)
Hm.  I think I may have been rather unclear with my description.  I have
my firewall configured to allow *all* outgoing connections, and to deny
all incoming connections (with the exception of a couple of totally
non-standard high-up ports that I'm using for file-sharing clients)
So... I'm assuming that when I initially connect to the server, I'm
initiating an outgoing connection, and just keeping the port open
indefinitely.  Which is why I can receive incoming messages... yes?
Now, my hypothesis (based on *very little* understanding) is that
Trillian reaches an agreement with the server that 'so-and-so
is online' packets will come down the same line, same (already-open)
port... so they slip by the firewall.  Maybe GnomeICU doesn't tell the
server that that's what I want, so the server sends those messages to
some *other* port, and the firewall drops 'em cause they show up as an
incoming connection.

> What I'm therefore guessing is going on, is something on your desktop
> machine. I use gaim all the time behind my NAT/firewall setup with no
> problems whatsoever. 
Curiouser and curiouser.

> Do all of your other programs work ok? Any network
> issues? 
Other programs are working fine, network performance is beautiful.
Somebody mentioned fsck, too (due to the scary and bizarre way that
Alicq imploded)... but the partition in question gets fsck'ed every time
I boot, and keeps coming up OK.  Also there have been *no* other strange
behaviours from any other programs that would seem to indicate disk
trouble or system problems.
Given that, I'm still inclined to believe that it's some combination of
client (or client configuration) and NAT/firewall setup that's
responsible.

> Just to test gaim's networking code, you may want to download
> gaim for win32 and try it under XP and see if it works.
> (http://gaim.sourceforge.net) That might be a good place to start to
> rule out the possibility of a client-based problem. Good luck.

Probably not a bad idea...
Even though I get this kind of dirty feeling whenever I boot into
Windows, these days...  Still, I might try that.

	Thanks for the input
	Keep it comin'
	-Chris

Attachment: pgp0qHqoAjVYT.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: