[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: spamc vs. razor-check ???



On 22-Feb-2003, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> This is what I have in ~/.procmailrc:
> 
> 	:0 Wc
> 	| razor-check
> 	:0 Waf
> 	| formail -A "X-Razor-Warning: SPAM."
> 
> 	:0fw: spamassassin.lock
> 	* < 256000
> 	| spamc
> 
> 	:0:
> 	* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes|\
>         	^X-Razor-Warning: SPAM
> 	spam

You might wish to use...

        :0fw
        | spamassassin -P

        :0:
        * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
        caughtspam

... instead. It puts all spam in a mailbox called caughtspam, and that is also
the "official" recommended way of doing it.


-- 
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@panax.com
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd 
all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to
repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989



Reply to: