Re: spamc vs. razor-check ???
On 22-Feb-2003, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> This is what I have in ~/.procmailrc:
>
> :0 Wc
> | razor-check
> :0 Waf
> | formail -A "X-Razor-Warning: SPAM."
>
> :0fw: spamassassin.lock
> * < 256000
> | spamc
>
> :0:
> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes|\
> ^X-Razor-Warning: SPAM
> spam
You might wish to use...
:0fw
| spamassassin -P
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
caughtspam
... instead. It puts all spam in a mailbox called caughtspam, and that is also
the "official" recommended way of doing it.
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown@panax.com
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd
all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to
repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989
Reply to: