Re: procmail dilemma ?!?!
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 04:53:41PM +1100, Michael Wardle wrote:
> On Friday, February 21, 2003 16:12, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
> > Also sprach Michael Wardle (Fri 21 Feb 02003 at 03:16:51PM +1100):
> > > * ^From:.*brian_tracy_newsletters@briantracy\.com
> > > companies/t/brian_tracy/current/
> >
> > For some reason, even your suggestions do *NOT* process the
> > NOT-variety of message!
>
> Ah! Notice that the NOT variety has no colon after the "From" header.
> I recently read that the From header is not guaranteed to be proceeded
> by a colon, so this may be a bad assumption on my part. Try removing
> the colon after the "From" in the rule/expression I provided.
"From " and "From:" are two different headers. "From " is basically a
fake header inserted based on the envelope sender, and is also the mbox
message separator. "From:" is guaranteed to have a colon.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: