[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: exim vs. mutt: envelope/from/sender ???



-- Michael D. Schleif <mds@helices.org> wrote
(on Monday, 17 February 2003, 04:21 PM -0600):
> 
> As some of you know, I am transitioning from netscrape to mutt mua's.
> 
> I am having some mail sending issues.
> 
> The host on which the new mail system resides is bragi.private.network. 
> The default exim and mutt installations passed this name onto the
> internet, whereupon intelligent mail servers rejected my mail, because
> private.network. is an unusable domain.
> 
> I own the domain: helices.org , which is hosted elsewhere.  I also have
> several other email addresses, all valid and I can receive mail using
> any of them.  This particular network sits behind attbi.com cablemodem,
> and it is not practical to host a valid public domain here.
> 
> I want to be able to change between email addresses from within mutt. 
> How do I do that?
> 
> Initially, I'd configured exim for this:

I don't use exim -- so I can't help you here.

> In ~/.muttrc, I have these weird variables, _none_ of which make it into
> received email:
> 
> 	set envelope_from=yes
> 	set from="Michael Zchleif <jmoke@helices.org>"
> 	set realname="Michael Zchleif <jmoke@helices.org>"

I have:
    set use_from
    set from=myaddress@mydomain
    set realname="My Name Goes Here"
    set alternates=(address1@domain1|address2@domain1|address3@domain2)
    set envelope_from
    set reverse_name

"from" should just be your address; realname should be the realname --
mutt makes it into "realname <from>". "use_from" (and "envelope_from",
IIRC) *MUST* be on for mutt to write the From header. "reverse_from"
will let mutt use the "To:" addressed in a mail be the "From:" address
when you reply; for this to work, you have to define a list of addresses
that you use in "alternates" (it's a regexp).

NONE of this will work if your MTA isn't set up to allow you to write
your own From header... so make sure that exim is set up correctly.

-- 
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
matthew@weierophinney.net



Reply to: