[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

gcc 3.2 + gcc 2.9?



dear list,

I had to uninstall video-dvdrip and many of its related programs
(transcode,...) when I upgraded from kde3.0.5 to 3.1. I recently tried
to reinstall transcode (for a start) and am somewhat puzzled by the
result: if I give testing as target release, apt-get finds unmet
dependencies:

Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: 
transcode: Depends: libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.2-1) but 1:3.2.1-0pre3 is to be
installed

if I give either stable or unstable as target release, it wants to
install gcc 3.2 (the following NEW packages will be installed:
gcc-3.2-base libstdc++5 transcode).
Is it possible to install gcc 3.2 besides gcc 2.95 currently installed
on my system? or should I expect to run into problems?

I'm running a testing/unstable system with kde3 from
http://ktown.kde.org/~nolden/kde stable main.

i'm not exactly a newbie anymore, but certainly not a computer expert
either. What can/should I do to avoid breaking my system?

Any help appreciated,

Thaden.

-- 
Es liegt ein Raeuberstaat am Meer,
zwischen Ostfriesland und der Schelde!


-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
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=x5bS
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----



Reply to: