On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 01:28:13AM -0500, Travis Crump wrote: > Not that I am complaining because security updates are always good, but > how exactly did perl 5.6.1-8.2 make it into testing sometime in the last > couple of days? It didn't come from unstable, because unstable moved to > perl 5.8.0 a while ago, and I didn't know that there /was/ any other way > for updated software to make its way into testing. It appears to have > originally been a stable security update from the end of November. For > it to just now make it to testing implies that someone made a special > effort to upload it, but noone cares about security updates for testing, > right? This is just an abject curiosity question to see if anyone can > explain the mystery... Are you *sure* it came from testing? 'apt-cache policy perl-base' will tell you. It is in security.d.o, and this has caused a bunch of problems for sarge users :/ -- Rob Weir <rweir@ertius.org> http://ertius.org/
Attachment:
pgpGa8LooBpKa.pgp
Description: PGP signature