[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] Re: shuttle disaster



On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 10:45:29PM -0600, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 21:46, Pigeon wrote:
> 
> > Alchemy is an interesting example... Of course, alchemy itself is
> > possible, because people used to do it. They were called alchemists.
> > The fact that they never achieved their fabled goals is because the
> > discipline they were following was mostly a pile of mystical bollocks
> > with very little scientific method. Now, we know that it is possible
> > to turn lead into gold, but it is not currently practical to do it on
> > more than the minutest scale. To extend one's lifespan is not
> 
> Actually, an interesting point of note is the fact that alchemists
> sought to transmute LEAD into gold, and not something like helium into
> gold. So obviously, intentionally or not, they had some basic knowledge
> of atomic mass. (Probably a rudimentary one based on the observations of
> physical mass, but an understanding none the less.) That, in turn,
> rather dismisses the point of this being "mystical rhetoric" and,
> instead, brings it into the realm of scientific pursuits.

An amusing point is that we now *do* have the ability to turn lead into
gold, but it's so expensive that we just dig it out of the ground.

-rob

Attachment: pgpQMoiK22_1d.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: