Re: Own kernel doesn't work
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 08:44:36PM +0000, Tim wrote:
> dbalder@pacbrands.com.au wrote:
> >make-kpkg --revision=your.kernel.name.1.0 kernel-image
> >dpkg -i your.kernel.name.1.0.deb
>
> Just so my notes are correct, is it kernel_image or kernel-image, and
> does it make a difference?
The man page only documents 'kernel_image', but
/usr/share/kernel-package/rules accepts either.
It looks as if 'kernel-image' was more or less deprecated long ago, but
kept around for compatibility:
kernel-package (2.01) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* Fixed the targets expected by make-kpkg (kernel_image rather than
kernel-image, etc).
[...]
-- Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@pilgrim.umass.edu>
That changelog entry is so old that it isn't even dated, though, so I
suspect that if Manoj were going to remove it then he'd probably have
done so by now.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: