RE: Icon manager geometry in TWM
TWM, I'd gather, has very few dependencies, making it a good choice for an
install disk.
Other than that, I haven't heard echoes of enjoyment from its users. I
don't think it's ever come near top for "what's the best window manager
poll)
If you like the non-obtrusive nature of twm (i have to admit it's nice to be
confronted with nothing, sometimes), "blackbox" "fluxbox" and "ion" have
recently been mentioned.
I use blackbox, myself, and it has a pretty readable .blackboxrc, too.
-----Original Message-----
From: Florian Sukup [mailto:debian2003@sukup.at]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7:15 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Icon manager geometry in TWM
Hi,
I'm new to Debian and using the very old window manager twm. I've already
spent much time to solve that problem but no success:
In my .twmrc file there is a line: IconManagerGeometry "=71x24-0+86"
But it simply ignores the value 24, no matter what I enter there.
At my SuSE Linux the default height was acceptable but the Debian Icons
are too high by default.
Does anyone know how to change it???
Thanks in advance,
Florian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.
Reply to: