[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Easiest Nameserver



On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 09:05:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote:
| At 2003-01-13T07:08:52Z, "Curtis Spencer" <cspenc@stanford.edu> writes:
| 
| > What is a good way to do this?  Is there an easy way?  I am running the
| > current unstable distribution.  Is there something I can apt-get easily?
| 
| The bind9 package should suit you nicely.  The default config file is very
| well-commented, so it should largely be a matter of altering according to
| instructions

I agree that bind9 is quite simple to get going (at least in debian).
Even chrooting it is quite painless (many of the redhat-oriented steps
in the howto can be skipped).

| and writing your "zone files" (which you'll have to do regardless of
| what DNS software you which to use).

Technically this isn't true.  A DNS server isn't required to store the
zones in the same format as bind.  djbdns comes to mind, as (IIRC) it
stores the records as funkily named empty files in a certain
directory.  This is not meant to start an ISC vs. DJB (vs. others)
war, but merely to point out that different systems can choose to have
a different admin interface.

-D

-- 
If any of you lacks wisdom, he should ask God, who gives generously to
all without finding fault, and it will be given to him.  But when he
asks he must believe and not doubt, because he who doubts is like a wave
of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind.
        James 1:5-6
 
http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/

Attachment: pgplWk8bIfSIg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: