RE: gcc-2.95 to -3.2 transition
I wouldn't know better, but I did hear someone give a talk (mostly over my
head) about the differences, the one phrase that stuck in my head was ABI,
and this article sorta confirms that...
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/c++-abi.html
-----Original Message-----
From: csj [mailto:csj@mindgate.net]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 12:16 PM
To: Debian User
Subject: gcc-2.95 to -3.2 transition
What's the real deal on the gcc-2.95 to gcc-3.2 transition? I've read enough
FUD I can't distinguish the facts. Particularly, what programs or libraries
are actually affected? What havoc would result from compiling the kernel or
X with 3.2 on a largely Testing system (since Testing has gcc-2.95 as the
default compiler)? Could the g(n)urus please speak up?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice.
Reply to: