Re: SPAM fiiltering

[Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org>]

"Mark L. Kahnt" <kahnt@hosehead.dyndns.org> writes:

> I just switched off SpamAssassin here because what had been an equal
> number of false positives and false negatives has instead proven to be
> nearly every spam not already filtered by my own Evolution filters and
> local blacklisting of a swath of worst-offender smtp-refuser getting
> through, while most commercially provided requested mailings are getting
> flagged. 

Are you using the older version in woody?  I use the unstable version
(on a woody machine) and haven't had a false positive in weeks.  I
have very few false negatives as well.

-- 
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - In a variety of flavors!
Temporarily out of tag lines.