Re: SSH vs SSH2

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SSH vs SSH2
From: Michael Heironimus <mkh01@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 02:41:09 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021202084109.GA29755@demonspawn.sterno.shacknet.nu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-user@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5.1.0.14.2.20021202091452.01922cb0@pop.soderlund.org>
References: <[🔎] 5.1.0.14.2.20021202091452.01922cb0@pop.soderlund.org>

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:16:52AM +0100, Niclas S?derlund wrote:
> thoughts/opinions on using ssh2 vs ssh1 ?
> 
> Will be used on a Debian 3.0r0 machine, will be used solely as a 
> mailserver, all other services/applications will be removed and the only 
> ports open will be 110, 25 and 22.

OpenSSH supports both protocol versions, but unless you really need it
you should disable support for version 1. v2 is generally more secure,
and I believe that clients are available on all major platforms.

-- 
Michael Heironimus

Reply to:

References:
- SSH vs SSH2
  - From: Niclas Söderlund <maillists@soderlund.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Portmap
Next by Date: Re: sound over lan
Previous by thread: Re: SSH vs SSH2
Next by thread: Portmap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread