Re: which is the best partition table format?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: which is the best partition table format?
From: Alan Chandler <alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 07:52:40 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 200212010752.41034.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk>
In-reply-to: <20021201044558.GB16322@dman.ddts.net>
References: <20021129191900.GA1238@dman.ddts.net> <200211301044.04466.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> <20021201044558.GB16322@dman.ddts.net>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 01 December 2002 4:45 am, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
...
>  Both VGs and LVs can be dynamically resized (though
> I'm not certain if LVs can decrease in size or only increase).  

You can decrease an LV if you have first decreased the overlaying filesystem.

- -- 
Alan Chandler
alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE96b/JuFHxcV2FFoIRAvhJAKCvkL2WC4PcMVyHpIuGon6q1i70zgCfQk8R
ZwABpPvwM8nNrik2oojMoqI=
=s5WB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: which is the best partition table format?
  - From: Derrick 'dman' Hudson <dman@dman.ddts.net>

Prev by Date: Re: How do I do a net install when there's no driver for my nic?
Next by Date: Re: debian user vs. browser plug-ins
Previous by thread: Re: Cheap CDs
Next by thread: Re: which is the best partition table format?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread