Re: [OT]: is this crap? -> wininformant headline "Most Insecure OS? Yep, It's Linux"

To: Debian User Mail List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [OT]: is this crap? -> wininformant headline "Most Insecure OS? Yep, It's Linux"
From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 20:35:19 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021129043519.GD11663@ursine>
Mail-followup-to: Debian User Mail List <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 00bc01c29700$c64a2fa0$0200a8c0@WORKSTATION>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0211281133120.29250-100000@router.windsormachine.com> <[🔎] 00bc01c29700$c64a2fa0$0200a8c0@WORKSTATION>

On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 12:08:29PM -0500, David Ellis wrote:
> Update". These machines for their lifetime were completely unhacked. My

I think the word you're looking for is "uncracked" in this case.


-- 
 .''`.     Baloo <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system

Attachment: pgpwAOaaG7JS5.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: [OT]: is this crap? -> wininformant headline "Most Insecure OS? Yep, It's Linux"
  - From: Mike Dresser <mdresser_l@windsormachine.com>
- Re: [OT]: is this crap? -> wininformant headline "Most Insecure OS? Yep, It's Linux"
  - From: "David Ellis" <david@ellisd.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: debian user vs. browser plug-ins
Next by Date: Re: [OT]: is this crap? -> wininformant headline "Most InsecureOS? Yep, It's Linux"
Previous by thread: Re: [OT]: is this crap? -> wininformant headline "Most Insecure OS? Yep, It's Linux"
Next by thread: Re: [OT]: is this crap? -> wininformant headline "Most Insecure OS? Yep, It's Linux"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread