[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ext2 vs ext3 vs xfs vs reiserfs



On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 10:42:21PM -0500, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2002 at 11:22am, Isaac To wrote:
> 
> :>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Hentges <eebe@gmx.net> writes:
> :
> :    Matthias> Ext3 is rock-stable since it is based on ext2 which is in use
> :    Matthias> for many years and is well tested.
> :
> :You probably cannot infer the stability of ext3 from that of ext2.  The
> :layout has been made mostly compatible, but the code has been changed for
> :much more than what you can trust without trying it.
> 
> Are you sure?  I thought that ext3 was just ext2 plus journal.  In fact,
> I've seen it suggested that you can safely revert from ext3 to ext2 by
> simply deleting the journal file and editing fstab.  I seem to remember
> seeing that on this list a while back as a way to shred files reliably so
> that they could _not_ be recovered from the ext3 journal.

The filesystem _layout_ is the same, the filesystem _code_ is not

Frank

> 
> I went to ext3 a month or so ago on a live system and have had no
> problems, but I haven't tried reverting to ext2.
> 
> Patrick
> 
> -- 
> Patrick Wiseman                               pwiseman@mindspring.com
> Linux user #17943                             *Google First, Ask Later*
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: