Re: mutt configuration
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 12:26:42AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 01:39:47PM +0530, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> > any ideas as to what is wrong? i want it to be
> > deshmukh@escortsmumbai.com all along
>
> This is broken behaviour and a spammish tactic. I would recommend
> against breaking your mail system in this manner if you wish to avoid
> automated spam filters.
Eh? He's trying to rewrite the envelope sender to something that exists.
That's not particularly unusual for dialup configurations. And how on
earth (or why on earth) would a filter be concerned about a purely local
adjustment like that?
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: