Re: NETWORK ROUTES

[Ángel Carrasco <falkom@arrakis.es>]

I cannot do it because, the big router has a little bandwidth only used by
these servers.

I try to use the office network to give internet all rest.


And the second, I would have to do NAT because, each router only manages his
range.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff" <jcoppock1@attbi.com>
To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: NETWORK ROUTES


> Ángel Carrasco, 2002-Oct-24 22:21 +0200:
> > I have two routers because I use one for internal users and other to use
> > with public internet servers. Ok? And I cannot manage or add new rules
in
> > these routers because they are administrated  by other company.
> >
> > Can you help me,please?
>
> > > My public network is:213.250.143.240/28 and his IP is:
213.250.143.242.
>
> > > 0.0.0.0     172.16.16.254   0.0.0.0     UG    0      0      0  eth3
>
> Try this, remove the above route and replace it with one to
> 213.250.143.242:
>
> # route del default gw 172.16.16.254
> # route add default gw 213.250.143.242
>
> and see it that fixes it.  I believe my previous post is all wrong as
> far as what I thought the route table should look like.  I think this
> is all you need to do.
>
> jc
>
> --
> Jeff Coppock Systems Engineer
> Diggin' Debian Admin and User
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>