on Fri, Oct 18, 2002, Crispin Wellington (crispin@aeonline.net) wrote: > On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 08:15, Curtis Vaughan wrote: <...> > One thing I have noticed is the Windows VNC viewer is *crap*. During > refreshes it will consume 100% CPU. Take two systems that are identical. > On one put linux with a vncviewer. On the other put windows with a VNC > viewer. Put them both on 100 Megabit ethernet. Load a programme that > changes the screen at 60fps. On the linux client you will get close to > 60fps updates. On the windows client you will be lucky to get 5fps. This > is definitely due to bad coding in the Windows client. There is no > reason why the windows client is so slow, other than its badly > programmed. Is that vanilla VNC (from the old Olivetti lab in the UK, now Lucent, soon to be defunct), or TightVNC? I find the latter tends to perform relatively well. Peace. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? TWikIWeThey: An experiment in collective intelligence. Stupidity. Whatever. http://twiki.iwethey.org/
Attachment:
pgpWVuHkB_Vru.pgp
Description: PGP signature