Re: gpg: invalid subkey binding
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 10:36:53AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com> [2002.10.05.1635 +0200]:
> > Do you have more than 2 sub-keys?
> looks like it. Is this not the way I should be doing it?
> > This has been discussed here many times.
> Sorry, I couldn't find a reference.
I think it was a Karsten Self's message within 12 month ;-)
> > I, for one, created a new GPG key for Debian application to avoid this
> > problem :-(
> I don't want to do that for I want one key for everything.
Neither did I. But I did not know better.
> Is my key now corrupted?
In PGP server, yes. But key is still valid. You just can not spread
key through PGP.NET. Which is very inconvienient, at least.
> Interestingly, when I pull the key from wwwkeys.pgp.net it shows up
> just fine but the two subkeys used for encryption aren't downloaded.
> They are when i retrieve the key from keyring.debian.org.
That is how it is now, as I understand.
> This is annoying. Why can't the pgp.net folks maintain working
> keyservers?
pgp.net is not Debian nor GNU. It is free(gratis) service and it looks
like they do not care. Sad.
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
.''`. Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
: :' : http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ also http://qref.sf.net
`. `' "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
Reply to: