also sprach Osamu Aoki <debian@aokiconsulting.com> [2002.10.05.1635 +0200]:
> Do you have more than 2 sub-keys?
pub 1024D/330C4A75 2001-06-20 Martin F. Krafft <madduck@madduck.net>
uid Martin F. Krafft (AERAsec GmbH) <mkrafft@aerasec.de>
uid Martin F. Krafft (Debian) <madduck@debian.org>
uid Martin F. Krafft (MB! Sudetia) <mkrafft@sudetia.de>
uid Martin F. Krafft (Uni Zuerich) <krafft@ifi.unizh.ch>
sub 2048g/D99FEE8D 2001-06-20 [expires: 2002-06-20]
sub 2048g/900227D4 2002-06-20 [expires: 2003-06-20]
looks like it. Is this not the way I should be doing it?
> This has been discussed here many times.
Sorry, I couldn't find a reference.
> I, for one, created a new GPG key for Debian application to avoid this
> problem :-(
I don't want to do that for I want one key for everything.
Is my key now corrupted?
Interestingly, when I pull the key from wwwkeys.pgp.net it shows up
just fine but the two subkeys used for encryption aren't downloaded.
They are when i retrieve the key from keyring.debian.org.
This is annoying. Why can't the pgp.net folks maintain working
keyservers?
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
"glaube heißt nicht wissen wollen, was wahr ist."
- friedrich nietzsche
Attachment:
pgpCY8U_tXRpS.pgp
Description: PGP signature